People have long banned books because of sexual content, differing ideologies, and critiques of the government or religion. I can get past banning a book from schools because of things like sexual content that may be inappropriate for young children but for having a different ideology than what you believe in. That’s just denying freedom of speech.
In a country that prides itself on liberty and freedom of expression, it’s ironic that books are still being removed from classrooms and libraries across the U.S. This seems deliberate, a political tactic directed at attacking our most fundamental rights, a show of power and complete control.
When we ban books, we silence voices. More often than not, these are already underrepresented voices. Banning books means stripping away the possibility for young people to research and make decisions for themselves based on different viewpoints. The very purpose of literature is to stimulate dialogue; it isn’t meant to be a fairytale all the time.
Many of the books discussed discuss topics of race, gender, sexuality, mental health, and systemic injustice. These aren’t inherently “dangerous” ideas; they’re real ideas with lived experiences for millions. When lawmakers decide that certain books are too controversial for students, they’re trying to convey that they’re scared these viewpoints will challenge people’s beliefs. These books threaten lawmakers and school boards who only want their children/students to believe in one thing. The diversity of thought is no longer being fostered; it’s being feared.
The First Amendment doesn’t come with many exceptions. It’s meant to give people the right to speak, listen, read and explore. You’re burning curiosity and exploration by banning books.
Every generation has its thinkers, leaders, and changemakers shaped, in part, by books that made them see the world differently. How will we foster the next generation of free thinkers? Books that challenge ideals are banned.
