The World Health Organization (WHO) was created to help countries work together to fight diseases and improve global health for all, providing aid in times of struggle. When President Donald Trump moved to withdraw the United States from the WHO, many people questioned whether this decision weakened the idea of international cooperation.
So why did Trump pull out? Trump argued that the WHO mishandled the COVID-19 pandemic, lacked transparency, and was too influenced by China. He believed the United States should not continue supporting an organization that he viewed as ineffective and in need of major reform.
Supporters of the WHO, like me, believe that global health problems require countries to work together because diseases do not stop at national borders; they spread like there is no tomorrow. We argue that remaining in the organization allows the United States to help shape policies and respond more effectively to future health emergencies.
Critics of the WHO agree that reforms are necessary but disagree on whether leaving is the best solution. They believe the United States can encourage improvements more effectively by remaining an active member rather than withdrawing.
Trump’s decision did not eliminate the WHO’s mission, but it challenged the belief that international organizations are the best way to solve global health problems. His decision may also cost America a huge problem if a global pandemic like COVID-19 happens.
Whether withdrawal strengthens accountability or weakens global cooperation remains a topic of ongoing debate.
